![First GeForce GTX 280 Benchmark Results First GeForce GTX 280 Benchmark Results](https://megagames.com/sites/default/files/styles/front-page-slide/public/game-content-images/nv_280_scores_3_sx.jpg)
![First GeForce GTX 280 Benchmark Results First GeForce GTX 280 Benchmark Results](https://megagames.com/sites/default/files/styles/front-page-slide/public/game-content-images/nv_280_scores_4.jpg)
![First GeForce GTX 280 Benchmark Results First GeForce GTX 280 Benchmark Results](https://megagames.com/sites/default/files/styles/front-page-slide/public/game-content-images/nv_280_scores_2.jpg)
![First GeForce GTX 280 Benchmark Results First GeForce GTX 280 Benchmark Results](https://megagames.com/sites/default/files/styles/front-page-slide/public/game-content-images/nv_280_scores_1.jpg)
"Nvidia's new chip [is] too big, too hot, too slow, and unmanufacturable", said The Inquirer's review before posting the first benchmark results for Nvidia's upcoming GeForce GTX 280. " It is all of that, and you will know why we said that in a few weeks", they added.
The Inquirer conducted an impressive sum of 28 tests, benchmarking Nvidia's upcoming monster to its current flagship GPU, the GeForce 9800 GTX; and here is what they found:
June 15, 2008 - 9:00pm